It is not only Western Buddhists who must ask about the contextualization of the Buddha’s message to American culture.
(PORTLAND,
OR) - I have often thought that Buddhism would become the secular
American’s religion of preference. James Atlas’ Sunday opinion piece in
The New York Times gives me reason to think there may be merit to what I
have pondered for years.
It
is often said that Buddhism is more about practices and ethics than
beliefs. Moreover, it has been argued that its particular emphasis on
meditation may contribute to healthy changes in human physiology and
speak to many post-moderns’ concerns to move beyond the mind-body
dualism. Of course, there are other religious traditions that also
challenge this division at a fundamental level, including movements
within Christianity, but it is interesting to see how the Buddhist
community may be shaping the conversation today. I look forward to
dialoguing with Buddhists, fellow Christians, and others on this and
related topics and collaborating with them on increasing secular
America’s spiritual sensitivities in our post-Christendom context.
Still,
I was struck by Atlas’ terms like “nightstand Buddhists” (taken from
Thomas A. Tweed) and “Newddhists” and wonder if this Western fascination
with Buddhism always reflects its Eastern sources at a fundamental
level. For example, former Buddhist and Roman Catholic author Paul
Williams says that the Buddhist notion of rebirth was not viewed
positively in places like India. In The Unexpected Way: On Converting
from Buddhism to Catholicism, Williams writes, “Rebirth, in Buddhism and
other early Indian systems of liberation, was seen as horrific. To
point out that ‘my’ rebirth involves among other things the destruction
of everything that counts as me would have been seen simply as
emphasizing how horrible rebirth is, and the need to escape from it
through spiritual liberation, nirvna.” Rebirth in the West is often
approached much more positively. While some argue that Williams’ point
pertains to one fairly narrow perspective, mostly in Theravada Buddhism,
nonetheless, nightstand devotees of the Buddhist or any other path must
account for embracing the world in all its suffering rather than
seeking to escape from it.
It
is not only Western Buddhists who must ask about the contextualization
of the Buddha’s message to American culture. I often ponder the same
theme, when reflecting on the reception of Christianity in America
today. We have our fair share of “nightstand Christians.” For example,
how does the prosperity gospel movement reflect well the call of Jesus
to die to ourselves, give to the poor, and store up for ourselves
treasures in heaven? We Christians have been guilty at times of putting a
power-of-positive-thinking spin on Jesus’ very hard teachings and have
lost out on the power of the gospel to die to our selfish desires in
service to others in the face of great suffering in the world.
Christians and Buddhists alike must be sensitive to how they convey
their traditions’ essential teachings to diverse cultural contexts,
demonstrating the complexities and cost involved in pursuit of their
ideals.
Engaged
Buddhism—that form of Buddhism concerned for addressing social
injustices referenced in Atlas’ article—intrigues me. My partnership
with Zen Buddhist Priest Kyogen Carlson has led us to ponder how
spiritual movements can partner together today to address social
inequities that reflect our shared concern for human well-being.
Features of our partnership are reflected in the book, Connecting
Christ: How to Discuss Jesus in a World of Diverse Paths. While we see
ultimate reality differently, and while we may approach the
sacred-secular and mind-body problems differently, we can still
collaborate in order to address the longing for value, meaning and
justice in a culture stripped of the sacred and wallowing in the
mundane.
Paul
Louis Metzger, Ph.D., is the Founder and Director of The Institute for
the Theology of Culture: New Wine, New Wineskins and Professor at
Multnomah Biblical Seminary/Multnomah University; Charter Member,
Evangelical Chapter of the Foundation for Religious Diplomacy; and
Author of Connecting Christ: How to Discuss Jesus in a World of Diverse
Paths (Thomas Nelson, 2012).
by Salem-News.com
Paul Louis Metzger, Ph.D.
2012-06-2
2012-06-2
No comments:
Post a Comment